You have been on a bit of a break from art making over the last couple of years to undergo a teaching degree. Can you tell us how teaching relates to your practice now and what has brought you to create work again?
I kind of lost motivation in my practice a few years after graduating from NSCAD. I was uncertain about why I was making work- it started to feel formulaic. I spent three years back in university, studying English, critical theory and teaching. When I started teaching art in I saw all of this amazing and weird work that the students were making and I was totally re-inspired to dig in to my practice again, this time with a lot more freedom and less worry about what I was doing.
During our conversation you mentioned that your practice is shifting. Can you elaborate how this is, and also on your use of the word intermedia to describe your work?
I’ve always struggled to figure out where my work fits. I used to mainly work in video, then I started drawing, then painting (except that my painting is informed by drawing) and now I am working more in audio and (not so) new media. I’m often working on a variety of things at once, with media shifting depending on what I’m thinking about. I’ve used words like intermedia, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary to describe my work, particularly as it has begun to intersect more with critical theory and music. Recently I heard someone suggest a move toward ‘antidisciplinary’ practice, which feels like a rich, if not potentially confrontational position to work from.
In your video ‘Somewhere Over The Rainbow/Fire Island” you found super 8 footage of a beach community known as Fire Island, a vacation place for the queer community on the outskirts of New York. The video is looped with the classic song (though it has been slowed until unrecognizable), and a man can be seen prancing and twirling around a light post. Because the footage has also been slowed, the man’s motion almost appears intentional, or a calculated spectacle of himself. Is this video a meditation on queerness and the viewer’s expectation of gendered social behaviour?
A meditation on queerness, yes. I think as the motion of the dancer repeats it becomes more and more abstracted and that abstraction allows for a slippage of meaning which illuminates a kind of queer gesture in the dancer’s movement. The more the motion is repeated the more it detaches from its origin – a simple twirl, and enters a multi-resonant space. I have been framing this resonance as a queer spectre, meaning that queerness emerges in a kind of spectral aura around the dancer, so that we read, not only the body as a signifier of queered social behaviour, but also the gesture itself as queered.
You describe your work continuously as being informed by “shape and rhythm”. Your paintings have layered visual metaphors, and your watercolors are steeped in an expressionist darkness: what haunts you or informs your gestures as you paint?
All of my work explores a kind of fascination with shape and rhythm, and the abstraction that comes from repetition. I’ll sit for hours drawing a single shape over and over, or spend a day with a ten second clip of a video watching the way it moves. I am deeply obsessive and I can be a bit fanatical about something being in a precise place in a composition- maybe a synesthesia? – a precise composition will hum or ring. I explore this tension in my paintings by interrupting the composition with large, uncalculated gestures, or layering on top of older paintings, and then working backwards until the piece feels whole again.
You’ve recently come back from an amazing expedition to Antartica studying the landscape to create a sound composition titled “Requiem for the Antartic Coast” commissioned by the Antartica Biennale (a stream of the Venice Biennale). Please tell us about this visual experience.
I’m still having difficulty putting the experience I had in Antarctica into words. I don’t know that there is language that describes Antarctica, as it is a place outside of human understanding. It is easy to believe that humans have dominated the planet, but when you encounter a place like Antarctica it becomes clear that that is just typical human narcissism. At first I felt very reverential approaching Antarctica, but as time went on the incomprehensibility of the continent became almost absurd, or our human interventions felt absurd on its shores. I am left thinking a lot about how culture, ritual and social convention are negotiated in a space outside of human inhabitations.
What’s next?
I get spend this summer at the Banff Centre working on a project about shifting ice masses in the Artic and Antarctic regions. After that I’m not sure.